Anti-Semitism is not Anti-Zionism and not Anti-Judaism

Picture: Sonja van den Ende, Beirout, Lebanon, NGO Global Return to Palestine – 2018.
The Statement of Neturei Karta International Jews Against Zionism, the head Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss
Authentic Jewry never recognized the EXISTENCE OF THE STATE OF ISRAEL, let alone Jerusalem as its capital, Rabbi Yisroel Dovid Weiss expressed in the interview, this is what he had to say:
Zionism, the movement that created the State of Israel, is the complete opposite of traditional Jewish belief. Judaism is subservience to the Almighty, while Zionism is a total transformation into nationalism, Ever since the destruction of the Jewish Temple, 2000 years ago, Jews have been in exile by Divine degree and are forbidden to establish a sovereign state of their own, or ta wage war against any nation; they are certainly forbidden to kill others or take the land of another people. The occupation of Palestine, the murder and expulsion of its people, and the oppression of those remaining are in total violation of the Jewish religion and traditional Jewish values. Read more:

A hot topic these days, leaders of the so-called “free – democratic” Western World are tireless telling their “national subjects” that anti-Semitism equals anti-Zionism.

First the explanation what is anti-Semitism

Anti-Semite literally means someone who is against Semites.

The term Semite refers in a neutral sense to someone who is part of one of the many classical and contemporary Semitic-speaking peoples who lived / live in the present Middle East, Eritrea, Ethiopia and Northern Somalia. The term was introduced in 1781 by the German historian August Ludwig Schlözer. He was referring to Sem (Hebrew: Shem), one of the three sons of Noah. According to the Volkerentafel of Genesis, Sem in turn got five sons, whose families would have grown into peoples who spread across the earth.

In ancient times, many tribes in the Middle East relied on descent from Shem. The scientific use of the term, however, relates to the language group, and by extension to cultural and ethnic groups. According to contemporary insights, which start from a strong interdependence between language use and culture, Semite is also valid for ethnic and cultural descriptions. The word “Semite” can therefore refer to every person who belongs to the ancient peoples of the Middle East, such as Arameans, Akkadians, Phoenicians, Hebrews, Arabs and their descendants.

The Zionists invented this term, exclusively for the decendants of the Isralietes or Hebrews, a weapon as justification.

The term was first used in (extensively) in Russia, during the Communist rule. Because, 70% of the Bolsheviks were from Jewish decent, one should distinguish between ordinary Jews and Zionist/Bolsheviks, the last two groups were without religion and they replaced the Orthodox Church and Synagoge in Russia with Communism or, as I rather call it Bolshevisme. After Stalin it became more like Socialism and gained it’s true meaning of Communism.

So, the Bolsheviks, under Stalin (mis) used the term anti-Semitisme, because as I said before 70% of them were Jews. The autonomous Russians knew this, most of them were peasants, they got treated very badly and many were send to the Gulag’s. Alexander Solzhenitsyn wrote his famous books about the Gulag, but moreover, about: Two hundred years together (2001-2002). German translation: Zweihundert Jahre zusammen. The Russian-Jewish Geschichte 1795-1916 (first part, 2002) and Zweihundert Jahre zusammen. The Juden in the Soviet Union (second part, 2003), which is only available in German and very expensive. It describe’s the history of the Jewish people in Russia and the rule or regime of the Bolsheviks. A bad part of history in Russia, but hardly mentioned in Western countries anymore. Anyway, the term anti-Semite, became very popular, like nowadays, maybe the last remains of the Bolsheviks?

Conclusion anti-Semitism: If you accuse someone that he or she is an anti-Semite, he or she is not only against Jews, but also against Arabs and any other people / descent, as described above. This term is exclusively used by the media, politics and Zionist for their own purposes.

Anti-Semitic, White Army propaganda poster of Trotsky / Photo: Wikimedia Commons


I want to make a distinction between Judaism and Israel. Judaism is a religion, which can be practised everywhere, Israel is a state, who claimed Judaism and therefore, not a secular state, or democracy. In a discussion, a while ago during a debate with the head of the Zionists in the Netherlands. I tried to explained this issue, the answer from the Zionist was that the Torah is connected to the state of Israel and Judaism. Which is not the definition of a secular state.

So Israel pretends to be a democracy, the only one in the Middle East, it says, but actually it is a state founded on Zionism, without separation of church (Synagogue) and state, which uses Judaism for justification. Where there is no room for different religions or seculars.


Zionism literally means the Jews aspirations towards their own state. The name refers to Zion, one of the Jerusalem hills. The term Zionism is first mentioned in the journal Selbstemanzipation (1890) by N. Birnbaum. The two pillars of the movement are:

The Jewish diaspora And the failure of the emancipation of the Jews in the 19th century.
Theodor Herzl, born in Budapest, gave the impetus to organized Zionism in 1896 with his pamphlet “Der Judenstaat”. In 1897 he convened the first International Zionist Congress in Basel. There would be five more congresses until 1902, which resulted in the foundation of the World Zionist Organization

Political Zionism arose in 19th century in Europe among secular Jews, and came mainly from the view that the emancipation of Jews in Europe failed because they had no state of their own, and also because of their different position in society.

Cultural Zionism, which often coincided with political Zionism, wanted to preserve and strengthen the Hebrew language and Jewish culture, which was threatened by the far-reaching assimilation of Jews in Western Europe in particular.

Socialist Zionism dominated from the 1920s to the 70s of the 20th century in Region of Palestine. which is now called Israel by the Western world.


The Zionist Story, an independent film by Ronen Berelovich, is the story of ethnic cleansing, colonialism and apartheid to produce a demographically Jewish State.

By 1967 it has become a determining factor in the politics of Israel. Together with the secular revisionist Zionists (a demerger from the 1920s), they strove for a larger territory for their state: religious Zionism, almost identical to what is known as modern Orthodox Judaism, combines a liberal interpretation of orthodox Judaism with Zionism.

What we now have in Israel is therefore religious Zionism, with the exclusivity of the right to exist and the exclusive right of the Jews in the state of Israel, they see themselves as the “God’s chosen people”were there is no room for others, this equals a non-democratic and non-secular state.

This is the current situation , where the head of the Zionists of the Netherlands, during the debate reffered to. The ideal of the kibbutz, as many Dutchmen/Europeans might have experienced in the seventies and eighties of the last century is no longer, this was under socialist Zionism, the rulers of Israel are no Socialist anymore.


Zionism, the movement that created the State of Israel, is the complete opposite of traditional Jewish belief. Judaism is subservience to the Almighty, while Zionism is a total transformation into nationalism, Ever since the destruction of the Jewish Temple, 2000 years ago, Jews have been in exile by Divine degree and are forbidden to establish a sovereign state of their own, or wage war against any nation; they are certainly forbidden to kill others or take the land of another people. The occupation of Palestine, the murder and expulsion of its people, and the oppression of those remaining are in total violation of the Jewish religion and traditional Jewish values.

The Zionist occupation of Palestine in 1948 brought devastation and suffering to both Arabs and Jews, who had until then lived together in peace and harmony. The expansion of this occupation in 1967, and the establishment of the settlements is an increased rebellion against God’s Toray, and has escalated the hatred and bloodshed in the region. (Rabbi Weiss).

In addition, the anti-Zionist Orthodox Jews for decades have been terribly oppressed, beaten and arrested by the Zionist regime. The most recent of which is their campaign to forcibly draft all of our (religous Judaist) community into their army and brutally suppress all voices of opposition.

The word anti-Semitism must simply be abolished, it is not exclusively for Israel to use it. It is negative and taken out of context. A REAL solution must be sought from/with various Western governments. The Western Governments misuses the word and mix Zionism with Semitism and Judaism. Which is and ugly propaganda tool and the cause of wars and misery.

Bron: Wikipedia, Rabbi Weiss, Freesuriyah Youtube



Israel opent een nieuwe ”apartheidsweg”



IBAN: NL10 SNSB 0902 6349 33

In Israel is een bijzondere weg geopend: de ”apartheidsweg”. Het is een stuk weg van vier kilometer lang met in het midden een hoge betonnen muur. De ene kant (de westelijke) is voor Palestijnen, die Jeruzalem niet in mogen en er op deze manier omheen kunnen rijden. De andere (oostelijke kant) is een weg voor Joden, die zo een verbinding hebben gekregen tussen de nederzetting Geva Benyamin ten noorden van Jeruzalem en de wijk French Hill in bezet Oost-Jeruzalem. Voor hen is het een soort shortcut naar de weg die noord en zuid op de Westoever met elkaar verbindt, route nr 60, en naar de hoofdweg nr 1 tussen Jeruzalem en Tel Aviv.

Israel had natuurlijk al langer apartheidswegen (aparte wegen voor Joden en Palestijnen). Maar het bijzondere van deze weg nr 4370 is dat het één en dezelfde weg is, die in de krant ook gewoon  ”apartheidsweg” heet. Bijzonder is natuurlijk ook die hoge betonnen muur in het midden. Maar blijkbaar kijken Israeli’s van een beetje beton en apartheid niet meer op.

– Eerder verschenen bij Abu Pessoptimist

Syria: Israel Bombs Damascus International Airport Warehouse



IBAN: NL10 SNSB 0902 6349 33

Israel Bomb Damascus International Airport Violates International Law

At 23:15 Damascus time 11 January, Israeli jets attempted to attack the Damascus International Airport with 9 missiles (bombs). Eight were intercepted by Syrian air defenses, and one got through, hitting a warehouse.

The extent of the damage has not been reported. Also not reported is whether the air defense systems used were the S300s or the S200s jerry-rigged with the help of the DPRK.

As always, Israel’s war criminal attack on Syria was an affront also to allies and foes. In February 2014, then President Obama gave one billion in loan guarantees to Jordan so that Israel could use its airspace to engage in war criminal bombings of Syria. Despite the bribe and geography, Israel prefers to illegally enter Lebanon’s airspace to bomb the SAR, and Lebanon continues not to complain about this continuing breach of its national integrity.

Israeli’s US-made and maintained and in most cases manned fighter jets use the geographical cover provided by the Lebanese Eastern Mountains with to hide from Syrian air defense systems, which is not available from Jordan’s airspace, and which was one of the main requests by Israeli agents in Lebanon in 2005 post-killing of former PM Hariri to withdraw Syrian air defense from Lebanon…

In geopolitics, timing is always of strategic importance. In this most recent criminal aggression against Syria, Israel chose the timing as a blatant insult to its “ally,’ the US. The bombings occurred within hours of the US’ announcement of the beginning of removing some of its illegal troops from the SAR. Later on, US media reported that only equipments, not troops are being removed from Syria.

Likely, Israel was throwing a double hissy fit against its American ally — the one that has provided it with 30 billion USD since 2007 — because of the failure of the Democratic members of the Senate to vote on S1 (2019).

Orwellianly named “Strengthening America’s Security in the Middle East Act of 2019,” the lengthy legislation is one long epistle against Syria and for Israel which was introduced by the gusano from Florida (who threw his own hissy fit over the Democrats refusing to vote on it until the partial shutdown of the Federal government is over).

For the record, the term “middle east” was the colonialist description of the British empire in its own mapping of countries it had occupied. This term has no business having been normalized.

Also for the record, here is a world map which clearly shows the location of the United States of America:

world map clearly shows the location of US

“Title IV — Combating the BDS Act of 2019,” a subsection of S1, has gotten all the press coverage. It essentially breaches the US Constitution by permitting states to pass legislation demanding what amounts to ‘loyalty oaths’ to Israel. This should give everyone a headache, as US lawmakers are sworn in by pledging to defend the Constitution “against all enemies, foreign and domestic.” The BDS campaign was actually launched by Israeli activists, several years ago.

afp photo of gusano from florida
Photo credit of Sen. Marco Rubio by AFP.

The senator neglecting his oath to defend the US Constitution not only engages in an affront to “free speech” via criminalizing BDS but maligns the First Amendment also by bringing religion into his political tweets.

Preying on the ignorance of American hyper-religious who play bible banquet, he too frequently cites specific biblical passages. Since he wishes to impose religion on the government, he were better to read the Book of Jeremiah, found in Nevi’im (a significant passage is found in Syria News’ report on Moti Kahana and Israel’s admission of stealing ancient artifacts from the world’s first synagogue, Eliyahu Hanav, in Jobar, Syria, near Damascus).

Any legislation which breaches the US Constitution must be considered that which it is: Treason.

He certainly should not use the bible out of context, to flaunt his ignorance of it: Torah and Tanakh clearly consider Israel calling itself “the Jewish State” an act of blasphemy.

Israel’s timing of its new round of war crimes against Syria is an appropriate example of the dog biting the hand that feeds it.

What has been ignored by virtually all, in reporting of the “US Taxpayer Doesn’t Give Israel Enough Money Act,” is that the S1 legislation is largely an imperialist attack on Syria. S1 demands the continuation of draconian, illicit, unilateral coercive economic measures against the SAR, wrongfully called “sanctions.”

The vile legislation shamelessly calls the Central Bank of Syria — which is its non-Federal Reserves linked national bank, committed to the promotion of the general welfare of Syrian citizenry — a money laundering apparatus. It requires that only [terrorist supporting, fake humanitarian] NGOs — generally located in Turkey — be allowed to receive monies. Many of these criminal NGOs have 501(c) US tax deduction status, which should be viewed by US taxpayers as a form of double-dipping for perpetual war.

A key portion of S1 is “Title III,” Capitol Hill’s third attempt to pass the “Caesar Syria Civilian Protection Act.” The “Caesar” psyops — called by some, “Curveball, Part II” — was launched 20 January 2014, two days before the beginning of Geneva peace talks. The fake photos were vetted by the terrorist Gulfiesmonarchy, the dirty little petro-toilet named Qatar, via a London-based law firm.

Qatar has admitted spending billions to destroy Syria for not permitting its pipeline to go through the country. Qatar has been involved in all forms of war criminal atrocities against the Syria population, from involvement in the bombings of the Homs refinery, to the kidnapping of Syrian women, to femicide, to mass slaughter in al Rashidin, 15 April 2017.



De muur in Zuid-Libanon



IBAN: NL10 SNSB 0902 6349 33

Afbeelding kan het volgende bevatten: buiten

De muur  Zuid-Libanon, foto: Claudius Lucassen, tekst: Sonja van den Ende

Afgelopen jaar was ik te gast en op uitnodiging in Libanon, zuid-Libanon, waar sinds februari 2018 begonnen is met de bouw van de muur tussen Israël en zuid-Libanon. D.w.z., een iniatief van Israël, deze Zionistische staat claimt bescherming nodig te hebben van Hezbollah, die de oorlog in 2006 gewonnen heeft!

Israël zegt dat zij de muur bouwen in afwachting van een poging van Hezbollah om de grens in de komende oorlog te overschrijden. Libanon en Hezbollah willen niet dat de muur wordt gebouwd. UNIFIL zei dat het de constructie volgt en communiceert met relevante partijen aan beide kanten van de grens om spanningen te verminderen en escalatie te voorkomen.

UNIFIL soldaten uit Indonesië, die permanent de muur bewaken, foto: Claudius Lucassen

Libanon heeft niet gevraagd om een oorlog, deze ook niet begonnen, ook is tegen de wil van het Libanese volk, de muur, degene die het bestand schenden zijn Israël, zoals dit het geval is met Palestina en Syrië. 

Israël  haar politiek is gebaseerd op leugens en veiligheid is zogenaamd hun grootste zorg, terwijl zij degene zijn die de veiligheid schenden van Palestijnen, Libanezen en Syriërs. Het grootste deel van de “Blue Line” was oorspronkelijk afgebakend in 1923 en delen werden later afgebakend tussen 1950 en 1967. In die tijd vertelden zowel Israël als Libanon de VN dat zij de Blauwe Lijn zouden respecteren zoals getekend door de VN. Israël blijft deze afspraken overtreden, natuurlijk wordt de andere kant beschuldigd, m.n. Hezbollah, maar ook wonen er vele Libanezen die lid zijn, of ondersteuning geven aan de Amal partij van Nabih Berri, deze partij heeft een alliantie met Hezbollah en hebben bij de laatse verkiezing afgelopen 6 mei de verkiezingen in Libanon gewonnen, zoals ik getuige was in Beirout afgelopen mei!

UNIFIL Soldaten uit Indonesië, die permanent de muur bewaken, foto Claudius Lucassen

Na diverse families gesproken te hebben, direct in Markaba, een klein stadje grenzend aan de muur met Israël, heb ik verontrustende dingen gehoord. .

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor markaba zuid libanon

Markaba is direct gelegen aan de “blue line” en de muur, bij de laatste oorlog in 2006 is er hevig gevochten en zijn er vele “martelaren” gevallen voor de bevrijding van Libanon, die Israël illegaal had bezet. Wie meer wil weten over de oorlog van 2006:

Israël heeft in 2006 en ook in de voorlaatste oorlog ( flink huisgehouden in Libanon, partijen tegen elkaar opgezegd en het verboden middel Agent Orange in beide oorlogen in gezet, m.n. in zuid-Libanon, waar nu meer dan 20 jaar later de gevolgen van deze chemische stof zichtbaar is en in Markaba en omringende dorpen en stadjes, als gevolg van de besmetting al meer dan 9000 kanker gevallen gemeld, velen met dodelijk afloop.

Dankzij Hezbollah, is Libanon er weer bovenop gekomen en zij zijn voorbereid op een escalatie met de Zionistische staat Israël, die illegaal oorlogen voert zowel in Libanon, Palestina als Syrië. De wereld is stil en de era of zogenaamd “fake news”, waar de alternatieve media iedere dag mee te maken heeft, is het moeilijk er over te berichten. Iedere uitspraak die tegen Israël gericht is of het woord Hezbollah kan je al in de Facebook “gevangenis” doen belanden, DDR en Sovjet STASI/KGB, methoden worden toegepast. Zowel bij de media als in de politiek. Wij leven in de era van persvrijheid repressie en kunnen voor onze ogen, (d.w.z.) degene die er open voor staan en net als ik de gebieden bezoekt, zien hoe diverse volkeren (geprobeerd) uitegeroeid worden, of althans een poging daartoe wordt ondernomen. Daarom richten deze volkeren, zoals de zuid-Libanezen, Hezbollah op, om de gevreesde vijand Israël, te verslaan, om zo in “vrede” in hun eigen land kunnen wonen!

De media is geen media meer maar een verlengstuk van politiek en “deep-state”, waar de waarheid verborgen moet blijven, zo ook de waarheid over zuid-Libanon en Hezbollah. Die gemakelijkheidshalve op de terroristische lijst gezet wordt. Hezbollah is daar voor de mensen en zonder hen zou Libanon verloren zijn en uitgeleverd aan of een “regime-change”of bezet, zoals delen van Golan Hoogte door de Zionistische staat Israël.

Bron: Markaba, UNIFIL, Wikipedia, fotografie; Claudius Lucassen, tekst; Sonja van den Ende